This essay explores the puzzle of human intelligence as an evolutionary anomaly—why, after billions of years, only one species developed recursive self-improvement and civilization-building capacity. It argues that the gap isn’t about raw intelligence but about a fundamental unwillingness to accept environmental constraints, and suggests that artificial intelligence may represent the next such phase transition in Earth’s history.

Google DeepMind’s partnership with Boston Dynamics represents a pivotal moment in embodied AI development, combining advanced AI models with capable robotic hardware. This essay explores both the genuine potential benefits—elder care, dangerous work, accessibility—and the serious risks of concentrated ownership over physical AI systems. The critical question isn’t whether this technology will exist, but whether its benefits will be distributed broadly or captured by the few companies building it.

This essay challenges the technical/non-technical binary as a social construction rather than cognitive reality, arguing that while dissolving interfaces make technical skills accessible to everyone, a new kind of literacy is required - not about operating machines, but about maintaining awareness and autonomy while thinking alongside AI systems that may serve interests other than our own.

This essay examines what chess’s survival and flourishing despite superhuman engines reveals about humanity’s potential relationship with AI. It explores why human chess retained meaning, what choices enabled coexistence, and the harder questions that emerge when we extend this analogy beyond games to work, governance, and society.

Humanity faces four possible futures: extinction through uncoordinated technological risk, enslavement under feudal capitalism where tech oligarchs control AI, stagnation where we muddle through without progress, or transcendence through human-AI merge on collective terms. Current trajectories favor enslavement unless the open source imperative prevails and human nature is removed from governance through encoded values rather than trusted willpower.