This essay explores the growing anxiety around undetectable AI-generated content, questioning whether pre-AI content was ever truly “authentic” given algorithmic curation. It examines the real shift from content scarcity to abundance, the limitations of detection solutions, and suggests that the human-AI boundary is already dissolving through collaboration—forcing us to develop new frameworks for trust and verification that focus on claims rather than authorship.

This essay examines what chess’s survival and flourishing despite superhuman engines reveals about humanity’s potential relationship with AI. It explores why human chess retained meaning, what choices enabled coexistence, and the harder questions that emerge when we extend this analogy beyond games to work, governance, and society.